About

Explore guidance documents and resources for your rare disease registry development and implementation. To learn more about how this database was developed, read our protocol and explore our data dictionary for variable definitions.

Showing 67 records Updated 2026-09-15 14:53:48

Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registriesTarrideOrphanet journal of rare diseases10.1186/S13023-024-03193-Y38711103"The goal of this research project was to review the literature on rare disease registries and identify best practices to improve the quality of RDRs."Not available2024Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Rare Disease RegistriesKodraInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/IJERPH1508164430081484"A rapid proliferation of RD registries has occurred during the last years and there is a need to develop guidance for the minimum requirements, recommendations and standards necessary to maintain a high-quality registry. In response to these heterogeneities, in the framework of RD-Connect, a European platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research, we report on a list of recommendations, developed by a group of experts, including members of patient organizations, to be used as a framework for improving the quality of RD registries."Not available2018Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
The EuRRECa Project as a Model for Data Access and Governance Policies for Rare Disease Registries That Collect Clinical OutcomesAliInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/IJERPH1723874333255540"For the purpose of this paper, we highlight vital aspects of data access and data governance policies for RD registries, using the European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa) as an example of a project that aims to promote good standards of practice for improving the quality of utilization of RD registries."Not available2020Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Joint Declaration of 10 Key Principles for Rare Disease Patient RegistriesEURORDIS-NORD-CORDNot availableNot availableNot available"On behalf of an estimated 60 million people living with rare diseases in Europe and North America, the European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) and the Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders (CORD), jointly submit the following declaration on common principles regarding Rare Disease Patient Registries."download2.eurordis.org2012Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) Guideline on registry-based studiesEuropean Medicines AgencyNot availableNot availableNot available"The objective of this Guideline is to provide recommendations on key methodological aspects that are specific to the use of patient registries by marketing authorisation applicants and holders (MAAs/MAHs) planning to conduct registry-based studies."www.ema.europa.eu2021Registry guidanceRegistry specific
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
So You Want to Build Your Disease's First Online Patient Registry: An Educational Guide for Patient Organizations Based on US and European ExperienceWicksPatient10.1007/S40271-023-00619-W/TABLES/736947286"In this Education article, a team of co-authors from across patient advocacy, technology, privacy, and commercial perspectives who have worked on a number of such projects offer a "Registry 101" primer to help get started."Not available2023Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Remodeling an existing rare disease registry to be used in regulatory context: Lessons learned and recommendationsMordentiFrontiers in Pharmacology10.3389/fphar.2022.96608136210847"The present study aims to highlight the key stages performed for remodeling the existing Registry of Multiple Osteochondromas-REM into a tool consistent with EMA observations and recommendations, as well as to lead the readers through the entire adapting, remodeling, and optimizing process. The process included a variety of procedures that can be summarized into three closely related categories: semantic interoperability, data quality, and governance."Not available2022Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
CIHI's Information Quality FrameworkCanadian Institute for Health InformationNot availableNot availableNot available"This document provides an overview of CIHI's Information Quality Framework. This framework provides an overarching structure for all of CIHI's quality management practices related to capturing and processing data and transforming it into information products. This Information Quality Framework evolved from and replaces CIHI's previous Data Quality Framework (which was introduced in 2001 and last updated in 2009)."www.cihi.ca2024Data quality/managementGenericRegistry developers/holders
Assessing Real-World Data Quality: The Application of Patient Registry Quality Criteria to Real-World Data and Real-World EvidenceGliklichTherapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science10.1007/S43441-019-00058-6/METRICS32072577"Patient registries are an important source of real-world data and real-world evidence. The good practices and evaluation criteria developed for patient registries are highly relevant to real-world data and real-world evidence and offer a foundation for a unified set of quality criteria that can be applied across sources of real-world data and real-world evidence intended for use in medical product evaluation."Not available2020Data quality/managementRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
The de novo FAIRification process of a registry for vascular anomaliesGroenenOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases10.1186/S13023-021-02004-Y/FIGURES/134481493"We successfully developed and implemented a process of making a rare disease registry for vascular anomalies FAIR from its conception-de novo. Here, we describe the five phases of this process in detail: (i) pre-FAIRification, (ii) facilitating FAIRification, (iii) data collection, (iv) generating FAIR data in real-time, and (v) using FAIR data."Not available2021
  • Data quality/management
  • Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Guidance on a data quality framework for health and social careHealth Information and Quality AuthorityNot availableNot availableNot available"This Guidance on a data quality framework for health and social care aims to provide organisations with the necessary tools to systematically assess, monitor, evaluate and improve data quality, which is a fundamental requirement for a safe and reliable healthcare system."www.hiqa.ie2018Data quality/managementGenericRegistry developers/holders
Towards a Core Set of Indicators for Data Quality of RegistriesHarkenerStudies in Health Technology and Informatics10.3233/SHTI19080331483252"Registries are a widely accepted method in health services research. Registry owners are faced with the challenge to document and assure data quality, vital for answering research questions and conducting quality research. Therefore a survey on indicators for data quality was conducted as part of a German funding initiative."Not available2019Data quality/managementRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settingsHooshafzaJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA10.1093/JAMIA/OCAC01735190833"The purpose of this study was to develop a framework to assess the quality of healthcare data sources."Not available2022Data quality/managementGenericRegistry developers/holders
Methodological guidelines and recommendations for efficient and rational governance of patient registriesZaletelNot availableNot availableNot available"The PARENT JA team is proud to present the Guidelines, which were created to provide practical and 'hands on' advice to set up and manage patient registries as well as to enable secondary use of data for public health policy and research."health.ec.europa.eu2016Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
National information system for rare diseases with an approach to data architecture: A systematic reviewDerayehIntractable & Rare Diseases Research10.5582/IRDR.2018.0106530181934"The study aims to systematically review literature on the rare diseases information system to identify architecture of this system from a data perspective."Not available2018
  • Registry guidance
  • Data quality/management
Rare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
EUCERD Core Recommendations on Rare Disease patient registration and data collectionEuropean Union Committee of Experts on Rare DiseasesNot availableNot availableNot available"This page is an archive of the EUCERD and ECEGRD's activities and information concerning the work of the EUCERD Joint Action (N° 2011 22 01, co-funded by the EU Health Programme)."health.ec.europa.eu2013Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Preparing data at the source to foster interoperability across rare disease resourcesRoosAdvances in Experimental Medicine and Biology10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_9/FIGURES/229214571"This chapter presents an approach to preparing rare disease data for integration through the application of a global standard for computer-readable data and knowledge. This includes the use of common data elements, ontological codes and computer-­readable data."Not available2017Interoperability beyond core data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
FAIRVASC: A semantic web approach to rare disease registry integrationMcGlinnComputers in Biology and Medicine10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2022.10531335405400"A federated querying approach is presented for accessing aggregated and pseudonymized data, and which supports analysis of AAV data in a manner which protects patient privacy."Not available2022Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Linked Registries: Connecting Rare Diseases Patient Registries through a Semantic Web LayerSernadelaBioMed Research International10.1155/2017/832798029214177"Developed a Semantic Web based solution that allows connecting distributed and heterogeneous registries, enabling the federation of knowledge between multiple independent environments. This semantic layer creates a holistic view over a set of anonymised registries, supporting semantic data representation, integrated access, and querying. The implemented system gave us the opportunity to answer challenging questions across disperse rare disease patient registries."Not available2017Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Semantic modelling of common data elements for rare disease registries, and a prototype workflow for their deployment over registry dataKaliyaperumalJournal of Biomedical Semantics10.1186/S13326-022-00264-6/FIGURES/635292119"The European Platform on Rare Disease Registration (EU RD Platform) aims to address the fragmentation of European rare disease (RD) patient data, scattered among hundreds of independent and non- coordinating registries, by establishing standards for integration and interoperability. The first practical output of this effort was a set of 16 Common Data Elements (CDEs) that should be implemented by all RD registries. Interoperability, however, requires decisions beyond data elements – including data models, formats, and semantics. Within the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD), we aim to further the goals of the EU RD Platform by generating reusable RD semantic model templates that follow the FAIR Data Principles."Not available2022Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
The EPIRARE proposal of a set of indicators and common data elements for the European platform for rare disease registrationTaruscioArchives of Public Health10.1186/2049-3258-72-35/TABLES/125352985"The European Union acknowledges the relevance of registries as key instruments for developing rare disease (RD) clinical research, improving patient care and health service (HS) planning and funded the EPIRARE project to improve standardization and data comparability among patient registries and to support new registries and data collections."Not available2014Common data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
The NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research Patient Registry Standard: A Report from the University of New Mexico's Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Patient RegistryDaneshvariNot availableNot available24551336"Recently, the NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research created a rare disease registry Standard to facilitate research across multiple registries. We implemented the Standard for the Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy patient registry created at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center. We performed a data element analysis for each Common Data Element defined in the Standard."Not available2013Common data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
NIH/NCATS/GRDR® Common Data Elements: A leading force for standardized data collectionRubinsteinContemporary Clinical Trials10.1016/J.CCT.2015.03.00325797358"The main goal of the NIH/NCATS GRDR® program is to serve as a central web-based global data repository to integrate de-identified patient clinical data from rare disease registries, EHR, clinical data and other data sources, in a standardized manner, to be available to researchers for conducting various biomedical studies, including clinical trials and to support analyses within and across diseases. The aim of the program is to advance research for many rare diseases and, by extension, common diseases as well. One of the first tasks toward achieving this goal was the development of a set of Common Data Elements (CDEs), which are controlled terminologies that represent collected data."Not available2015Common data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
International Harmonisation of Real-World Evidence Terminology and Convergence of 3 General Principles Regarding Planning and Reporting of Studies Using Real-World Data, with a Focus on Effectiveness of MedicinesInternational Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human UseNot availableNot availableNot available"This Reflection Paper outlines a strategic approach for ICH to address some of these challenges. The goal is to further enable the integration of RWE into regulatory submissions and timely regulatory decision-making."www.ema.europa.eu2023Registry guidanceGeneric
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
Standardized Data Structures in Rare Diseases: CDISC User Guides for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Huntington's DiseaseMullinClinical and Translational Science10.1111/CTS.1284532702147"Use of international data standards can assist in data harmonization and enable data exchange, integration into larger data- sets, and a quantitative understanding of disease natural history. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the use of Clinical Data Interchange Consortium (CDISC) Standards in new drug submissions to help the agency efficiently and effectively receive, process, review, and archive submissions, as well as to help integrate data to answer research questions."Not available2021Interoperability beyond core data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
Development and Pilot Test of the Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool: An Information Technology-Based Tool to Support and Review RegistriesAllenValue in Health10.1016/J.JVAL.2021.12.01835277336"The European Network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action 3 led the work to develop a tool for the evaluation of clinical registries: the "Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool" (REQueST)."Not available2022Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
An assessment of the quality of the I-DSD and the I-CAH registries – international registries for rare conditions affecting sex developmentKourimeOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases10.1186/S13023-017-0603-7/FIGURES/628320446"This study was performed to evaluate the I-DSD and I-CAH Registries and identify their strengths and weaknesses."Not available2017Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Capturing Data in Rare Disease Registries to Support Regulatory Decision Making: A Survey Study Among Industry and Other StakeholdersJonkerDrug Safety10.1007/S40264-021-01081-Z34091881"The objective of this study was to investigate the opinion of stakeholders about key aspects of rare disease registries that are used to support regulatory decision making and to compare the responses of employees from industry to other stakeholders."Not available2021Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Discussion paper: Use of patient disease registries for regulatory purposes – methodological and operational considerationsEuropean Medicines AgencyNot availableNot availableNot available"The objective of this paper is to discuss methodological and operational aspects of patient disease registries."www.eucope.org2018Registry guidanceRegistry specific
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
The Six Primary Dimensions For Data Quality Assessment, Defining Data Quality DimensionsDAMA U.K. Working GroupNot availableNot availableNot available"In May 2012, DAMA UK asked for volunteers to join a working group to consider the issue and produce some best practice advice."www.sbctc.edu2013Data quality/managementGenericRegistry developers/holders
The RD-Connect Registry & Biobank Finder: a tool for sharing aggregated data and metadata among rare disease researchersGainottiEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG10.1038/S41431-017-0085-Z29396563"Here, we present RD-Connect Registry & Biobank Finder, a tool that helps RD researchers to find RD biobanks and registries and provide information on the availability and accessibility of content in each database."Not available2018Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
A Quality Assessment of the ARM-Net Registry Design and Data CollectionHagemanJournal of Pediatric Surgery10.1016/J.JPEDSURG.2023.02.04937045715"The Anorectal Malformation Network (ARM-Net) registry is a well-established European patient registry collecting demographic, clinical, and functional outcome data. We assessed the quality of this registry through review of the structure, data elements, collected data, and user experience."Not available2023Data quality/management
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Data Quality Framework for EU medicines regulationEuropean Medicines AgencyNot availableNot availableNot available"This document is the first release of the EU Data Quality Framework (DQF) for medicines regulation and defines high-level principles and procedures that apply across EMA's regulatory mandate. This framework provides general considerations on data quality that are relevant for regulatory decision making, definitions for data quality dimensions and sub-dimensions, as well as their characterisation and related metrics."www.ema.europa.eu2023Data quality/managementGenericRegistry developers/holders
Guidance for Reporting Real-World EvidenceCanada's Drug AgencyNot availableNot availableNot available"Guidance for Reporting Real-World Evidence lays the foundation for the use of RWE in regulatory approval and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Canada, starting with the principles for reporting of RWE studies. CADTH, Health Canada, and INESSS intend to use the guidance as appropriate for their individual needs, aligned to the principles outlined in the document. This initiative forms the foundation for transparent reporting of RWE studies in Canada and facilitates appraisal of RWE for the purpose of supporting decision-making."www.cda-amc.ca2023Registry guidanceGeneric
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
Rare Diseases: Considerations for the Development of Drugs and Biological ProductsU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationNot availableNot availableNot available"The purpose of this guidance is to assist sponsors of drugs for the treatment of rare diseases in conducting efficient and successful drug development programs."www.fda.gov2023Registry guidanceRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
Real-World Data: Assessing Registries To Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological ProductsU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationNot availableNot availableNot available"This guidance provides considerations for sponsors proposing to design a new registry or use an existing registry to support regulatory decision-making about a drug's effectiveness or safety."www.fda.gov2023Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Rare Diseases: Natural History Studies for Drug DevelopmentU.S. Food and Drug AdministrationNot availableNot availableNot available"This guidance is intended to help inform the design and implementation of natural history studies that can be used to support the development of safe and effective drugs and biological products for rare diseases."www.fda.gov2019Registry guidanceRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
Contribution of patient registries to regulatory decision making on rare diseases medicinal products in EuropeJonkerFrontiers in pharmacology10.3389/FPHAR.2022.92464835991868"In this review, we illustrate the utility of patient registries across the different stages of development of medicinal products, including orphans, to provide evidence in the context of clinical studies and to generate post-authorisation long term data on their effectiveness and safety profiles."Not available2022Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Natural History and Real-World Data in Rare Diseases: Applications, Limitations, and Future PerspectivesLiuThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology10.1002/JCPH.213436461748"This review provides an introduction to rare diseases, natural history data, RWD, and real-world evidence, the respective sources and applications of these data in several rare diseases."Not available2022Registry guidanceRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
Rare disease registries: potential applications towards impact on development of new drug treatmentsJansen-Van Der WeideOrphanet journal of rare diseases10.1186/S13023-018-0836-030185208"We describe the potential applications of a RDR and what type of information should be incorporated to support the design of clinical trials in the process of drug development, based on a broad inventory of registry experience. We evaluated two existing RDRs in more detail to check the completeness of these RDRs for trial design."Not available2018Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
  • Registry developers/holders
  • Registry users
Use of real-world evidence in regulatory decisions for rare diseases in the United States-Current status and future directionsWuPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety10.1002/PDS.496232003065"We use three case examples-cerliponase alfa, asfotase alfa, and uridine triacetate-to illustrate how RWD from disease registries, medical records with chart review, and literature, respectively, have been used to generate RWE to support regulatory decisions for selected rare diseases."Not available2020Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Balancing the Optimal and the Feasible: A Practical Guide for Setting Up Patient Registries for the Collection of Real-World Data for Health Care Decision Making Based on Dutch Experiencesde GrootValue in Health10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.02.00728408005"The aim of this article was to provide practical guidance in setting up patient registries to facilitate real-world data collection for health care decision making."Not available2017Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Identifying the capabilities for creating next-generation registries: a guide for data leaders and a case for "registry science"LabkoffJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association10.1093/JAMIA/OCAE02438400744"The article provides an outline of the technology roles and responsibilities needed for successful implementations of next-generation registries."Not available2024Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Guide to Developing a National Patient RegistryWorld Federation of HemophiliaNot availableNot availableNot available"This guide explains what a registry is, identifies the different types of registries that have been used successfully around the world, details the steps involved in setting up and maintaining an effective national patient registry, and discusses how to use the valuable data contained in a registry"www1.wfh.org2005Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
A Framework for Integrating Heterogeneous Clinical Data for a Disease Area into a Central Data WarehouseKarmenStudies in Health Technology and Informatics10.3233/978-1-61499-432-9-106025160351"In this paper we describe a framework how to approach an integration of heterogeneous clinical data into a central register. This enables site-spanning queries for the occurrence of specific clinical facts and thus supports clinical research. The framework consists of three sequential steps, starting from a formal data harmonization process, to the data transformation methods and finally the integration into a proper data warehouse."Not available2014Interoperability beyond core data elementsRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
The creation of an adaptable informed consent form for research purposes to overcome national and institutional bottlenecks in ethics review: experience from rare disease registriesLandiFrontiers in Medicine10.3389/FMED.2024.1384026/BIBTEX38695032"The aim of this work is to develop an adaptable ICF for research purposes to be used in ERN registries."Not available2024Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Generalizable EHR-R-REDCap pipeline for a national multi-institutional rare tumor patient registryShalhoutJAMIA Open10.1093/JAMIAOPEN/OOAB11835156001"Objective: To develop a clinical informatics pipeline designed to capture large-scale structured Electronic Health Record (EHR) data for a national patient registry."Not available2022
  • Registry platform
  • Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Construction and management of ARDS/sepsis registry with REDCapPangJournal of Thoracic Disease10.3978/J.ISSN.2072-1439.2014.09.0725276372"Objective: The study aimed to construct and manage an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)/sepsis registry that can be used for data warehousing and clinical research."Not available2014Registry platform
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Using a Web-Based Data Collection Platform to Implement an Effective Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome RegistryLizzioArthroscopy Techniques10.1016/J.EATS.2019.01.01231334007
  • "This technique guide presents an overview of designing and implementing a PROM- based clinical registry for the ambulatory orthopaedic clinic using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap
  • Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). We outline the basic steps of creating a simple but effective patient registry using this accessible data collection platform."
Not available2019Registry platformRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Framework for Multistakeholder Patient Registries in the Field of Rare Diseases: Focus on Neurogenetic DiseasesSchoenmakersNeurology10.1212/WNL.000000000020974339173102"This study aims to develop a practical framework for creating and implementing patient registries addressing common challenges and maximizing their impact on care, research, drug development, and regulatory decision making with a focus on RNDs. A comprehensive 3-step literature and qualitative research approach was used to develop the framework."Not available2024Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Disease monitoring programs of rare genetic diseases: transparent data sharing between academic and commercial stakeholdersLochmüllerOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases10.1186/S13023-021-01687-733743771"We developed the concept of Disease Monitoring Programs (DMPs), which are designed to monitor disease manifestations over a 10-year period whether on a sponsored drug or not, and ensure consistent collection, ownership sharing and governance of data."Not available2021Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Patient and family engagement in the development of core outcome sets for two rare chronic diseases in childrenVanderhoutResearch Involvement and Engagement10.1186/S40900-021-00304-Y/FIGURES/134521478"In this paper, as researchers and patient partners, we provide a resource for COS developers to meaningfully and effectively engage patients and families."Not available2021Common data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenanceHagemanOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases10.1186/S13023-023-02719-037147718"We aimed to describe an overview of the challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance of rare disease registries."Not available2023Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's GuideGliklichAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)10.23970/AHRQEPCREGISTRIES424945055"The purpose of this revised fourth edition is to incorporate information on new methodological and technological advances into the existing chapters and to consolidate and organize the content into a format that emphasizes the key principles of registry design, operations, and analysis."Not available2020Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Transferability of real-world data across borders for regulatory and health technology assessment decision-makingJaksaFrontiers in Medicine10.3389/FMED.2022.107367836465931"We therefore performed a review of stakeholder guidance as well as selected case studies to identify themes for researchers to consider when transferring RWD from one jurisdiction to another."Not available2022Interoperability beyond core data elementsGenericRegistry developers/holders
Record linkage based patient intersection cardinality for rare disease studies using Mainzelliste and secure multi-party computationKusselJournal of Translational Medicine10.1186/S12967-022-03671-6/FIGURES/536209221"To alleviate this problem and to support rare disease research, we developed the Mainzelliste Secure EpiLinker (MainSEL) record linkage framework, a secure Multi-Party Computation based application using trusted-third-party-less cryptographic protocols to perform privacy-preserving record linkage with high security guarantees."Not available2022Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
The Matchmaker Exchange API: automating patient matching through the exchange of structured phenotypic and genotypic profilesBuskeHuman mutation10.1002/HUMU.2285026255989We present the Matchmaker Exchange Application Programming Interface (MME API), a protocol and data format for exchanging phenotype and genotype profiles to enable matchmaking among patient databases, facilitate the identification of additional cohorts, and increase the rate with which rare diseases can be researched and diagnosed."Not available2015Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Cross-Border Exchange of Clinical Data Using Archetype Concepts Compatible with the International Patient SummaryTcharaktchievStudies in health technology and informatics10.3233/SHTI20022132570444"This paper proposes an approach and demonstrates its application for cross- border exchange of clinical documents oriented towards the use of archetype concepts and international patient summary standards adopted in the European Union."Not available2020Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic reviewOmbashiOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases10.1186/S13023-023-02901-437735442"This review aimed to provide a scientific basis for the conceptualization of this registry by studying previous registry initiatives."Not available2023Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Enabling External Inquiries to an Existing Patient Registry by Using the Open Source Registry System for Rare Diseases: Demonstration of the System Using the European Society for Immunodeficiencies RegistryScheibleJMIR medical informatics10.2196/1742033026355"Data from the PID-NET registry should be made available in an interoperable manner without losing data sovereignty by extending the existing custom software of the registry using the OSSE registry framework."Not available2020Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UKStubbsBMC medical informatics and decision making10.1186/S12911-024-02775-X/TABLES/339604990"We examined experiences of existing UK disease registries to understand barriers and enablers to establishing and sustaining a register, and how these have changed over time."Not available2024Registry guidanceRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
The TOSCA Registry for Tuberous Sclerosis-Lessons Learnt for Future Registry Development in Rare and Complex DiseasesMarquesFrontiers in Neurology10.3389/FNEUR.2019.01182/BIBTEX31798515"The aims of this study were to identify issues that arose during the design, execution, and publication phases of TOSCA, and to reflect on lessons learnt that may guide future registries in rare and complex diseases."Not available2019Registry guidance
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
Linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets with RareLink: a scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease data interoperabilityGraefemedRxiv10.1101/2025.05.09.2532734240385395", we developed and validated RareLink, an open-source framework implementing our previously-published ontology-based rare disease common data model, enabling standardised data exchange between REDCap, international registries, and downstream analysis tools."Not available2025Interoperability beyond core data elements
  • Rare disease specific
  • Registry specific
Registry developers/holders
The Minimum Data Set for Rare Diseases: Systematic ReviewAndrade BernardiJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4464137498666"This study aimed to identify and analyze the Minimum Data Sets used for RD in health care networks worldwide and compare them with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines."Not available2023Common data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
A methodology for a minimum data set for rare diseases to support national centers of excellence for healthcare and researchChoquetJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA10.1136/AMIAJNL-2014-00279425038198"To encourage consensus at a national level for homogeneous data collection at the point of care for rare disease patients, we first identified four national expert groups. We reviewed the scientific literature for rare disease common data elements (CDEs) in order to build the first version of the F-MDS-RD."Not available2015Common data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders
Achieving Data Liquidity: Lessons Learned from Analysis of 38 Clinical Registries (The Duke-Pew Data Interoperability ProjectTchengAMIA Annual Symposium ProceedingsNot available32308883"To assess the current state of clinical data interoperability, we evaluated the use of data standards across 38 large professional society registries."Not available2020Interoperability beyond core data elementsRegistry specificRegistry developers/holders
Minimum National Rare Disease Dataset (MDDS)Banque Nationale de Données Maladies RaresNot availableNot availableNot available"A minimum national rare disease dataset (MDDS) common to all stakeholders and all diseases has been defined to enable the structured collection of high-quality, usable data across the country. This dataset must be collected from every patient with a rare disease seen at a rare disease reference or expertise center."www.bndmr.fr2024Common data elementsRare disease specificRegistry developers/holders