| Scoping review of the recommendations and guidance for improving the quality of rare disease registries | Tarride | Orphanet journal of rare diseases | 10.1186/S13023-024-03193-Y | 38711103 | "The goal of this research project was to review the literature on rare disease registries and identify best practices to improve the quality of RDRs." | –Not available | 2024 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Rare Disease Registries | Kodra | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 10.3390/IJERPH15081644 | 30081484 | "A rapid proliferation of RD registries has
occurred during the last years and there is a need to develop guidance for the minimum requirements, recommendations and standards necessary to maintain a high-quality registry. In response to these
heterogeneities, in the framework of RD-Connect, a European platform connecting databases, registries, biobanks and clinical bioinformatics for rare disease research, we report on a list of recommendations,
developed by a group of experts, including members of patient organizations, to be used as a framework for improving the quality of RD registries." | –Not available | 2018 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| The EuRRECa Project as a Model for Data Access and Governance Policies for Rare Disease Registries That Collect Clinical Outcomes | Ali | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 10.3390/IJERPH17238743 | 33255540 | "For the purpose of this paper, we highlight vital aspects of data access and data
governance policies for RD registries, using the European Registries for Rare Endocrine Conditions (EuRRECa) as an example of a project that aims to promote good standards of practice for improving the quality of utilization of RD registries." | –Not available | 2020 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Joint Declaration of 10 Key Principles for Rare Disease Patient Registries | EURORDIS-NORD-CORD | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "On behalf of an estimated 60 million people living with rare diseases in Europe and North America, the European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) and the Canadian Organization for Rare Disorders (CORD), jointly submit the following declaration on common principles regarding Rare Disease Patient Registries." | download2.eurordis.org | 2012 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP) Guideline on registry-based studies | European Medicines Agency | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "The objective of this Guideline is to provide recommendations on key methodological aspects that are specific to the use of patient registries by marketing authorisation applicants and holders (MAAs/MAHs) planning to conduct registry-based studies." | www.ema.europa.eu | 2021 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| So You Want to Build Your Disease's First Online Patient Registry: An Educational Guide for Patient Organizations Based on US and European Experience | Wicks | Patient | 10.1007/S40271-023-00619-W/TABLES/7 | 36947286 | "In this Education article, a team of co-authors from across patient advocacy, technology, privacy, and commercial perspectives who have worked on a number of such projects offer a "Registry 101" primer to help get started." | –Not available | 2023 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Remodeling an existing rare disease registry to be used in regulatory context: Lessons learned and recommendations | Mordenti | Frontiers in Pharmacology | 10.3389/fphar.2022.966081 | 36210847 | "The present study aims to highlight the key stages performed for remodeling the existing Registry of Multiple Osteochondromas-REM into a tool consistent with EMA observations and recommendations, as well as to lead the readers through the entire adapting, remodeling, and optimizing process. The process included a variety of procedures that can be summarized into three closely related categories: semantic interoperability, data quality, and governance." | –Not available | 2022 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| CIHI's Information Quality Framework | Canadian Institute for Health Information | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This document provides an overview of CIHI's Information Quality Framework. This framework provides an overarching structure for all of CIHI's quality management practices related to
capturing and processing data and transforming it into information products. This Information Quality Framework evolved from and replaces CIHI's previous Data Quality Framework (which was introduced in 2001 and last updated in 2009)." | www.cihi.ca | 2024 | Data quality/management | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| Assessing Real-World Data Quality: The Application of Patient Registry Quality Criteria to Real-World Data and Real-World Evidence | Gliklich | Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science | 10.1007/S43441-019-00058-6/METRICS | 32072577 | "Patient registries are an important source of real-world data and real-world
evidence. The good practices and evaluation criteria developed for patient registries are highly relevant to real-world data and real-world evidence and offer a foundation for a unified set of quality criteria that can be applied across sources of real-world data and real-world evidence intended for use in medical product evaluation." | –Not available | 2020 | Data quality/management | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| The de novo FAIRification process of a registry for vascular anomalies | Groenen | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 10.1186/S13023-021-02004-Y/FIGURES/1 | 34481493 | "We successfully developed and implemented a process of making a rare disease registry for vascular anomalies FAIR from its conception-de novo. Here, we describe the five phases of this process in detail: (i) pre-FAIRification, (ii) facilitating FAIRification, (iii) data collection, (iv) generating FAIR data in real-time, and (v) using FAIR data." | –Not available | 2021 | - Data quality/management
- Interoperability beyond core data elements
| - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Guidance on a data quality framework for health and social care | Health Information and Quality Authority | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This Guidance on a data quality framework for health and social care aims to provide organisations with the necessary tools to systematically assess, monitor, evaluate and improve data quality, which is a fundamental requirement for a safe and reliable healthcare system." | www.hiqa.ie | 2018 | Data quality/management | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| Towards a Core Set of Indicators for Data Quality of Registries | Harkener | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics | 10.3233/SHTI190803 | 31483252 | "Registries are a widely accepted method in health services research. Registry owners are faced with the challenge to document and assure data quality, vital for answering research questions and conducting quality research. Therefore a survey on indicators for data quality was conducted as part of a German funding initiative." | –Not available | 2019 | Data quality/management | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Development of a framework to assess the quality of data sources in healthcare settings | Hooshafza | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA | 10.1093/JAMIA/OCAC017 | 35190833 | "The purpose of this study was to develop a framework to assess the quality of healthcare data sources." | –Not available | 2022 | Data quality/management | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| Methodological guidelines and recommendations for efficient and rational governance of patient registries | Zaletel | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "The PARENT JA team is proud to present the Guidelines, which were created to provide practical and 'hands on' advice to set up and manage patient registries as well as to enable secondary use of data for public health policy and research." | health.ec.europa.eu | 2016 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| National information system for rare diseases with an approach to data architecture: A systematic review | Derayeh | Intractable & Rare Diseases Research | 10.5582/IRDR.2018.01065 | 30181934 | "The study aims to systematically review literature on the rare diseases information system to identify architecture of this system from a data perspective." | –Not available | 2018 | - Registry guidance
- Data quality/management
| Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| EUCERD Core Recommendations on Rare Disease patient registration and data collection | European Union Committee of Experts on Rare Diseases | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This page is an archive of the EUCERD and ECEGRD's activities and information concerning the work of the EUCERD Joint Action (N° 2011 22 01, co-funded by the EU Health Programme)." | health.ec.europa.eu | 2013 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Preparing data at the source to foster interoperability across rare disease resources | Roos | Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology | 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_9/FIGURES/2 | 29214571 | "This chapter presents an approach to preparing rare disease data for integration
through the application of a global standard for computer-readable data and knowledge. This includes the use of common data elements, ontological codes and computer-readable data." | –Not available | 2017 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| FAIRVASC: A semantic web approach to rare disease registry integration | McGlinn | Computers in Biology and Medicine | 10.1016/J.COMPBIOMED.2022.105313 | 35405400 | "A federated querying approach is presented for accessing aggregated and pseudonymized data, and which supports analysis of AAV data in a manner which protects patient privacy." | –Not available | 2022 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Linked Registries: Connecting Rare Diseases Patient Registries through a Semantic Web Layer | Sernadela | BioMed Research International | 10.1155/2017/8327980 | 29214177 | "Developed a Semantic Web based solution that allows connecting distributed and heterogeneous registries, enabling the
federation of knowledge between multiple independent environments. This semantic layer creates a holistic view over a set of
anonymised registries, supporting semantic data representation, integrated access, and querying. The implemented system gave
us the opportunity to answer challenging questions across disperse rare disease patient registries." | –Not available | 2017 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Semantic modelling of common data elements for rare disease registries, and a prototype workflow for their deployment over registry data | Kaliyaperumal | Journal of Biomedical Semantics | 10.1186/S13326-022-00264-6/FIGURES/6 | 35292119 | "The European Platform on Rare Disease Registration (EU RD Platform) aims to address the fragmentation of European rare disease (RD) patient data, scattered among hundreds of independent and non-
coordinating registries, by establishing standards for integration and interoperability. The first practical output of this effort was a set of 16 Common Data Elements (CDEs) that should be implemented by all RD registries.
Interoperability, however, requires decisions beyond data elements – including data models, formats, and semantics.
Within the European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD), we aim to further the goals of the EU RD Platform by generating reusable RD semantic model templates that follow the FAIR Data Principles." | –Not available | 2022 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| The EPIRARE proposal of a set of indicators and common data elements for the European platform for rare disease registration | Taruscio | Archives of Public Health | 10.1186/2049-3258-72-35/TABLES/1 | 25352985 | "The European Union acknowledges the relevance of registries as key instruments for developing rare disease (RD) clinical research, improving patient care and health service (HS) planning and funded the EPIRARE project to improve standardization and data comparability among patient registries and to support new registries
and data collections." | –Not available | 2014 | Common data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| The NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research Patient Registry Standard: A Report from the University of New Mexico's Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Patient Registry | Daneshvari | –Not available | –Not available | 24551336 | "Recently, the NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research created a rare disease registry Standard to facilitate research across multiple registries. We implemented the Standard for the Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy patient registry created at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences
Center. We performed a data element analysis for each Common Data Element defined in the Standard." | –Not available | 2013 | Common data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| NIH/NCATS/GRDR® Common Data Elements: A leading force for standardized data collection | Rubinstein | Contemporary Clinical Trials | 10.1016/J.CCT.2015.03.003 | 25797358 | "The main goal of the NIH/NCATS GRDR® program is to serve as a central web-based global data repository to integrate de-identified patient clinical data from rare disease registries, EHR, clinical data and other data sources, in a standardized manner, to be available to researchers for conducting various biomedical studies, including clinical trials and to support analyses within and across diseases. The aim of the program is to advance research for many rare diseases and, by extension,
common diseases as well. One of the first tasks toward achieving this goal was the development of a set of Common Data
Elements (CDEs), which are controlled terminologies that represent collected data." | –Not available | 2015 | Common data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| International Harmonisation of Real-World Evidence Terminology and Convergence of 3 General Principles Regarding Planning and Reporting of Studies Using Real-World Data, with a Focus on Effectiveness of Medicines | International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This Reflection Paper outlines a strategic approach for ICH to address some of these challenges. The goal is to further enable the integration of RWE into regulatory submissions and timely regulatory decision-making." | www.ema.europa.eu | 2023 | Registry guidance | Generic | - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| Standardized Data Structures in Rare Diseases: CDISC User Guides for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Huntington's Disease | Mullin | Clinical and Translational Science | 10.1111/CTS.12845 | 32702147 | "Use of international data standards can assist in data harmonization and enable data exchange, integration into larger data-
sets, and a quantitative understanding of disease natural history. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires the
use of Clinical Data Interchange Consortium (CDISC) Standards in new drug submissions to help the agency efficiently and
effectively receive, process, review, and archive submissions, as well as to help integrate data to answer research questions." | –Not available | 2021 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Development and Pilot Test of the Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool: An Information Technology-Based Tool to Support and Review Registries | Allen | Value in Health | 10.1016/J.JVAL.2021.12.018 | 35277336 | "The European Network for Health Technology Assessment Joint Action 3 led the work to develop a tool for the evaluation of clinical registries: the "Registry Evaluation and Quality Standards Tool" (REQueST)." | –Not available | 2022 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| An assessment of the quality of the I-DSD and the I-CAH registries – international registries for rare conditions affecting sex development | Kourime | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 10.1186/S13023-017-0603-7/FIGURES/6 | 28320446 | "This study was performed to evaluate the I-DSD and I-CAH Registries and identify their strengths and weaknesses." | –Not available | 2017 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Capturing Data in Rare Disease Registries to Support Regulatory Decision Making: A Survey Study Among Industry and Other Stakeholders | Jonker | Drug Safety | 10.1007/S40264-021-01081-Z | 34091881 | "The objective of this study was to investigate the opinion of stakeholders about key aspects of rare disease registries that are used to support regulatory decision making and to compare the responses of employees from industry to other stakeholders." | –Not available | 2021 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Discussion paper: Use of patient disease registries for regulatory purposes – methodological and operational considerations | European Medicines Agency | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "The objective of this paper is to discuss methodological and operational aspects of patient disease registries." | www.eucope.org | 2018 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| The Six Primary Dimensions For Data Quality Assessment, Defining Data Quality Dimensions | DAMA U.K. Working Group | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "In May 2012, DAMA UK asked for volunteers to join a working group to consider the issue and produce some best practice advice." | www.sbctc.edu | 2013 | Data quality/management | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| The RD-Connect Registry & Biobank Finder: a tool for sharing aggregated data and metadata among rare disease researchers | Gainotti | European journal of human genetics : EJHG | 10.1038/S41431-017-0085-Z | 29396563 | "Here, we present RD-Connect Registry & Biobank Finder, a tool that helps RD researchers to find RD biobanks and registries and provide information on the availability and accessibility of content in each database." | –Not available | 2018 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| A Quality Assessment of the ARM-Net Registry Design and Data Collection | Hageman | Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 10.1016/J.JPEDSURG.2023.02.049 | 37045715 | "The Anorectal Malformation Network
(ARM-Net) registry is a well-established European patient registry collecting demographic, clinical, and functional outcome data. We assessed the quality of this registry through review of the structure, data elements, collected data, and user experience." | –Not available | 2023 | Data quality/management | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Data Quality Framework for EU medicines regulation | European Medicines Agency | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This document is the first release of the EU Data Quality Framework (DQF) for medicines regulation and defines high-level principles and procedures that apply across EMA's regulatory mandate. This framework provides general considerations on data quality that are relevant for regulatory decision making, definitions for data quality dimensions and sub-dimensions, as well as their characterisation and related metrics." | www.ema.europa.eu | 2023 | Data quality/management | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| Guidance for Reporting Real-World Evidence | Canada's Drug Agency | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "Guidance for Reporting Real-World Evidence lays the foundation for the use of RWE in regulatory approval and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in Canada, starting with the principles for reporting of RWE studies. CADTH, Health Canada, and INESSS intend to use the guidance as appropriate for their individual needs, aligned to the principles outlined in the document. This initiative forms the foundation for transparent reporting of RWE studies in Canada and facilitates appraisal of RWE for the purpose of supporting decision-making." | www.cda-amc.ca | 2023 | Registry guidance | Generic | - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| Rare Diseases: Considerations for the Development of Drugs and Biological Products | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "The purpose of this guidance is to assist sponsors of drugs for the treatment of rare diseases in conducting efficient and successful drug development programs." | www.fda.gov | 2023 | Registry guidance | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Real-World Data: Assessing Registries To Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Drug and Biological Products | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This guidance provides considerations for sponsors proposing to design a new registry or use an existing registry to support regulatory decision-making about a drug's effectiveness or safety." | www.fda.gov | 2023 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Rare Diseases: Natural History Studies for Drug Development | U.S. Food and Drug Administration | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This guidance is intended to help inform the design and implementation of natural history studies that can be used to support the development of safe and effective drugs and biological products for rare diseases." | www.fda.gov | 2019 | Registry guidance | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Contribution of patient registries to regulatory decision making on rare diseases medicinal products in Europe | Jonker | Frontiers in pharmacology | 10.3389/FPHAR.2022.924648 | 35991868 | "In this review, we illustrate the utility
of patient registries across the different stages of development of medicinal products, including orphans, to provide evidence in the context of clinical studies and to generate post-authorisation long term data on their effectiveness and safety profiles." | –Not available | 2022 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Natural History and Real-World Data in Rare Diseases: Applications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives | Liu | The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 10.1002/JCPH.2134 | 36461748 | "This review provides an introduction to rare diseases, natural history data, RWD, and real-world evidence, the respective sources and applications of these data in several rare diseases." | –Not available | 2022 | Registry guidance | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Rare disease registries: potential applications towards impact on development of new drug treatments | Jansen-Van Der Weide | Orphanet journal of rare diseases | 10.1186/S13023-018-0836-0 | 30185208 | "We describe the potential applications of a RDR and what type of information should be incorporated to support the design of clinical trials in the process of drug development, based on a broad inventory of registry experience. We evaluated two existing RDRs in more detail to check the completeness of these RDRs for trial design." | –Not available | 2018 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| - Registry developers/holders
- Registry users
|
| Use of real-world evidence in regulatory decisions for rare diseases in the United States-Current status and future directions | Wu | Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 10.1002/PDS.4962 | 32003065 | "We use three case examples-cerliponase alfa, asfotase alfa, and uridine triacetate-to illustrate how RWD from disease registries, medical records with chart review, and literature, respectively, have been used to generate RWE to support regulatory decisions for selected rare diseases." | –Not available | 2020 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Balancing the Optimal and the Feasible: A Practical Guide for Setting Up Patient Registries for the Collection of Real-World Data for Health Care Decision Making Based on Dutch Experiences | de Groot | Value in Health | 10.1016/J.JVAL.2016.02.007 | 28408005 | "The aim of this article was to provide practical guidance in setting up patient registries to facilitate real-world data collection
for health care decision making." | –Not available | 2017 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Identifying the capabilities for creating next-generation registries: a guide for data leaders and a case for "registry science" | Labkoff | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | 10.1093/JAMIA/OCAE024 | 38400744 | "The article provides an outline of the technology roles and responsibilities needed for successful implementations of
next-generation registries." | –Not available | 2024 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Guide to Developing a National Patient Registry | World Federation of Hemophilia | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "This guide explains what a registry is, identifies the different types of registries
that have been used successfully around the world, details the steps involved in
setting up and maintaining an effective national patient registry, and discusses
how to use the valuable data contained in a registry" | www1.wfh.org | 2005 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| A Framework for Integrating Heterogeneous Clinical Data for a Disease Area into a Central Data Warehouse | Karmen | Studies in Health Technology and Informatics | 10.3233/978-1-61499-432-9-1060 | 25160351 | "In this paper we describe a framework how to approach an integration of heterogeneous clinical data into a central register. This enables site-spanning queries for the occurrence of specific clinical facts and thus supports clinical research. The framework consists of three sequential steps, starting from a formal data harmonization process, to the data transformation methods and finally the
integration into a proper data warehouse." | –Not available | 2014 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| The creation of an adaptable informed consent form for research purposes to overcome national and institutional bottlenecks in ethics review: experience from rare disease registries | Landi | Frontiers in Medicine | 10.3389/FMED.2024.1384026/BIBTEX | 38695032 | "The aim of this work is to develop an adaptable ICF for research purposes to be used in ERN registries." | –Not available | 2024 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Generalizable EHR-R-REDCap pipeline for a national multi-institutional rare tumor patient registry | Shalhout | JAMIA Open | 10.1093/JAMIAOPEN/OOAB118 | 35156001 | "Objective: To develop a clinical informatics pipeline designed to capture large-scale structured Electronic Health Record (EHR) data for a national patient registry." | –Not available | 2022 | - Registry platform
- Interoperability beyond core data elements
| - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Construction and management of ARDS/sepsis registry with REDCap | Pang | Journal of Thoracic Disease | 10.3978/J.ISSN.2072-1439.2014.09.07 | 25276372 | "Objective: The study aimed to construct and manage an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)/sepsis registry that can be used for data warehousing and clinical research." | –Not available | 2014 | Registry platform | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Using a Web-Based Data Collection Platform to Implement an Effective Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Registry | Lizzio | Arthroscopy Techniques | 10.1016/J.EATS.2019.01.012 | 31334007 | - "This technique guide presents an overview of designing and implementing a PROM-
based clinical registry for the ambulatory orthopaedic clinic using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). We outline the basic steps of creating a simple but effective patient registry using this accessible data collection platform."
| –Not available | 2019 | Registry platform | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Framework for Multistakeholder Patient Registries in the Field of Rare Diseases: Focus on Neurogenetic Diseases | Schoenmakers | Neurology | 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209743 | 39173102 | "This study aims to develop a practical framework for creating and implementing patient registries addressing common challenges and maximizing their impact on care, research, drug development, and regulatory decision making with a focus
on RNDs. A comprehensive 3-step literature and qualitative research approach was used to develop the framework." | –Not available | 2024 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Disease monitoring programs of rare genetic diseases: transparent data sharing between academic and commercial stakeholders | Lochmüller | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 10.1186/S13023-021-01687-7 | 33743771 | "We developed the concept of Disease Monitoring Programs (DMPs), which are designed to monitor disease manifestations over a 10-year period whether on a sponsored drug or not, and ensure consistent collection, ownership sharing and governance of data." | –Not available | 2021 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Patient and family engagement in the development of core outcome sets for two rare chronic diseases in children | Vanderhout | Research Involvement and Engagement | 10.1186/S40900-021-00304-Y/FIGURES/1 | 34521478 | "In this paper, as researchers and patient
partners, we provide a resource for COS developers to meaningfully and effectively engage patients and families." | –Not available | 2021 | Common data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| A systematic overview of rare disease patient registries: challenges in design, quality management, and maintenance | Hageman | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 10.1186/S13023-023-02719-0 | 37147718 | "We aimed to describe an overview of the challenges in design, quality
management, and maintenance of rare disease registries." | –Not available | 2023 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide | Gliklich | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) | 10.23970/AHRQEPCREGISTRIES4 | 24945055 | "The purpose of this revised fourth edition is to incorporate information on new methodological and technological advances into the existing chapters and to consolidate and organize the content
into a format that emphasizes the key principles of registry design, operations, and analysis." | –Not available | 2020 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Transferability of real-world data across borders for regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making | Jaksa | Frontiers in Medicine | 10.3389/FMED.2022.1073678 | 36465931 | "We therefore performed a review of stakeholder guidance as well as selected case studies to identify themes for researchers to consider when transferring RWD from one jurisdiction to another." | –Not available | 2022 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | Generic | Registry developers/holders |
| Record linkage based patient intersection cardinality for rare disease studies using Mainzelliste and secure multi-party computation | Kussel | Journal of Translational Medicine | 10.1186/S12967-022-03671-6/FIGURES/5 | 36209221 | "To alleviate this problem and to support rare disease research, we developed the Mainzelliste Secure EpiLinker (MainSEL) record linkage framework, a secure Multi-Party Computation based application using trusted-third-party-less cryptographic
protocols to perform privacy-preserving record linkage with high security guarantees." | –Not available | 2022 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| The Matchmaker Exchange API: automating patient matching through the exchange of structured phenotypic and genotypic profiles | Buske | Human mutation | 10.1002/HUMU.22850 | 26255989 | We present the Matchmaker Exchange Application Programming Interface (MME API), a protocol and data format for exchanging phenotype and genotype profiles to enable matchmaking among patient databases, facilitate the identification of additional cohorts, and increase the rate with which rare
diseases can be researched and diagnosed." | –Not available | 2015 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Cross-Border Exchange of Clinical Data Using Archetype Concepts Compatible with the International Patient Summary | Tcharaktchiev | Studies in health technology and informatics | 10.3233/SHTI200221 | 32570444 | "This paper proposes an approach and demonstrates its application for
cross- border exchange of clinical documents oriented towards the use of archetype concepts and international patient summary standards adopted in the European
Union." | –Not available | 2020 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Guidance to develop a multidisciplinary, international, pediatric registry: a systematic review | Ombashi | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | 10.1186/S13023-023-02901-4 | 37735442 | "This review aimed to provide a scientific basis for the conceptualization of this registry by studying previous registry initiatives." | –Not available | 2023 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Enabling External Inquiries to an Existing Patient Registry by Using the Open Source Registry System for Rare Diseases: Demonstration of the System Using the European Society for Immunodeficiencies Registry | Scheible | JMIR medical informatics | 10.2196/17420 | 33026355 | "Data from the PID-NET registry should be made available in an interoperable manner without losing data sovereignty
by extending the existing custom software of the registry using the OSSE registry framework." | –Not available | 2020 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| How to establish and sustain a disease registry: insights from a qualitative study of six disease registries in the UK | Stubbs | BMC medical informatics and decision making | 10.1186/S12911-024-02775-X/TABLES/3 | 39604990 | "We examined experiences of existing UK disease registries to understand barriers and enablers to establishing and sustaining a register, and how these have changed over time." | –Not available | 2024 | Registry guidance | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| The TOSCA Registry for Tuberous Sclerosis-Lessons Learnt for Future Registry Development in Rare and Complex Diseases | Marques | Frontiers in Neurology | 10.3389/FNEUR.2019.01182/BIBTEX | 31798515 | "The aims of this study were to identify issues that arose during the design, execution, and publication phases of TOSCA, and to reflect on lessons learnt that may guide future registries in rare and
complex diseases." | –Not available | 2019 | Registry guidance | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| Linking international registries to FHIR and Phenopackets with RareLink: a scalable REDCap-based framework for rare disease data interoperability | Graefe | medRxiv | 10.1101/2025.05.09.25327342 | 40385395 | ", we developed and validated RareLink, an open-source framework implementing our
previously-published ontology-based rare disease common data model, enabling standardised data exchange between REDCap, international registries, and downstream analysis tools." | –Not available | 2025 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | - Rare disease specific
- Registry specific
| Registry developers/holders |
| The Minimum Data Set for Rare Diseases: Systematic Review | Andrade Bernardi | Journal of Medical Internet Research | 10.2196/44641 | 37498666 | "This study aimed to identify and analyze the Minimum Data Sets used for RD in health care networks worldwide and compare them with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines." | –Not available | 2023 | Common data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| A methodology for a minimum data set for rare diseases to support national centers of excellence for healthcare and research | Choquet | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA | 10.1136/AMIAJNL-2014-002794 | 25038198 | "To encourage consensus at a national level for homogeneous data collection at the point of care for rare disease patients, we first identified four national expert groups. We reviewed the scientific literature for rare disease common data elements (CDEs) in order to build the first version of the F-MDS-RD." | –Not available | 2015 | Common data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Achieving Data Liquidity: Lessons Learned from Analysis of 38 Clinical Registries (The Duke-Pew Data Interoperability Project | Tcheng | AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings | –Not available | 32308883 | "To assess the current state of clinical data interoperability, we evaluated the use of data standards across 38 large professional society registries." | –Not available | 2020 | Interoperability beyond core data elements | Registry specific | Registry developers/holders |
| Minimum National Rare Disease Dataset (MDDS) | Banque Nationale de Données Maladies Rares | –Not available | –Not available | –Not available | "A minimum national rare disease dataset (MDDS) common to all stakeholders and all diseases has been defined to enable the structured collection of high-quality, usable data across the country. This dataset must be collected from every patient with a rare disease seen at a rare disease reference or expertise center." | www.bndmr.fr | 2024 | Common data elements | Rare disease specific | Registry developers/holders |